Florida State University alumni are using artificial intelligence to help make legislation easier to understand.

Their startup, Delilah, is an AI-powered platform that summarizes complex bills and allows users to ask questions about proposed laws through a conversational interface.  Founded by recent FSU graduates with experience in government and public policy, the company has gained national attention, reaching the Top 100 on the App Store.

Delilah, short for Dashboard for Economic and Legislative Insights with Live Analytics and History, grew out of founder Joseph Visconti’s experience as a gubernatorial fellow at the Florida Capitol.

Working closely with legislation, he saw firsthand how difficult it can be for citizens to navigate bills that can span hundreds of pages.

“We have these really long bills that do important things, but they’re extremely hard to read and understand,” Visconti said. “We wanted to make these bills accessible and comprehensible for people who aren’t working in government.”

Delilah allows users to ask questions about federal, state and local legislation, receive summaries and access links to the original bill text. The team says the platform is designed to help users research public policy without specialized legal or legislative expertise.

The post FSU alumni launch AI startup to make legislation more accessible appeared first on Florida State University News.

The model combines real-time and historical data to predict outbreaks and protect public health

Every summer, beach closures disrupt families, harm local businesses and raise public health alarms. Most of the time, the warning comes after it is already too late.

A new artificial intelligence framework developed at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering aims to change that by alerting water managers to E. coli contamination risk before anyone falls sick.

Researchers led by Assistant Professor Nasrin Alamdari developed an AI-powered predictive modeling framework that uses environmental and hydrometeorological data to provide early warnings of Escherichia coli (E. coli) contamination in recreational waterways, giving communities a window to act before health risks emerge.

Their model, which was published in Water Research, identified unsafe conditions with approximately 85% accuracy, demonstrating its potential to offer earlier warnings before levels reach unsafe thresholds.

“Beach closures often occur because we detect contamination after water conditions have already become unsafe,” said Alamdari, a researcher in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Resilient Infrastructure and Disaster Response (RIDER) Center. “Our goal is to move from a reactive approach to a predictive one, leveraging continuous environmental data, including rainfall, river flow, turbidity, temperature and upstream conditions, to estimate E. coli levels in near real time and up to a day in advance.”

How it works

Traditional water quality monitoring relies on manual sampling followed by laboratory analysis, a process that takes 18 to 24 hours to yield results. By the time a beach or river is closed, swimmers may have already been exposed to dangerous levels of contamination.

The framework developed by researchers uses current and historical environmental data to estimate contamination risk without waiting for lab results. Inputs include upstream hydrologic conditions, streamflow rates, rainfall totals, turbidity readings and water temperature. By combining these variables, the model can flag elevated E. coli risk with 24 hours advance warning.

A 2023 sewage spill that occurred after a malfunction at the Big Creek Water Reclamation Facility illustrates exactly the kind of scenario the model is built to address.

“The 2023 Big Creek sewage spill is an example of how a sudden treatment failure can rapidly contaminate downstream recreational waters,” said Ali Salou Moumouni, a graduate researcher on the project. “Our predictive models use current and past environmental and hydrometeorological data to estimate contamination risk before lab results arrive. By factoring in upstream hydrologic conditions, our model provides earlier warnings and more targeted monitoring, improving preparedness during sudden contamination events.”

Why it matters: Human health impacts and economic costs

E. coli contamination in recreational waterways can infect people swimming there, causing gastrointestinal distress, nausea or fatigue. Vulnerable populations, such as the very young or old, are at greater risk.

The consequences of delayed contamination alerts extend beyond public health. When closures happen unexpectedly, hotels, outfitters and water recreation businesses lose revenue with little warning. Municipalities absorb higher costs from emergency public notifications and increased health incident response.

“Delays expose the public to greater health risks and increase medical expenses from waterborne illness,” Alamdari said. “Local economies that depend on recreation and tourism suffer revenue losses when visitors cancel trips or avoid affected areas, while municipalities incur higher operational costs for water testing and emergency response. Repeated advisories can also erode public trust, leading to longer-term declines in visitation and further economic loss.”

Proactive alerts, by contrast, give businesses and government agencies advance notice, reduce unnecessary closures and help communities protect both public health and economic stability. By shifting from reactive to predictive monitoring, communities can better protect public health while reducing unnecessary closures and improving economic resilience.

Risk factors

The study also documents how land use changes intensify contamination. Between 2007 and 2023, urbanization in the study area increased impervious cover from 24% to 28%, altering runoff pathways, leading to more polluted runoff and higher and more variable E. coli levels in streams.

As precipitation patterns grow less predictable, even moderate rainfall events carry elevated contamination risk in urbanized watersheds. The model accounts for rainfall history, streamflow and watershed wetness indicators to improve prediction during those in-between conditions that traditional models often miss.

“Our findings show that every development decision influences water quality and public health, highlighting the need for green infrastructure,” said Imtiaz Syed Usama, a graduate researcher on the team.

Storms compound the problem. E. coli levels can spike within hours of heavy rainfall, but traditional lab testing is too slow to catch those surges before people enter the water.

“Our model flips the script: by combining rainfall, streamflow, turbidity and other hydrometeorological data, it helps predict E. coli risk in near real time and up to a day ahead, including during extreme weather,” said Nasr Azadani Mitra, a graduate researcher at RIDER. “Communities without routine lab testing can still issue early warnings and protect public health.”

This research was supported by grants from Florida State University.

The post FAMU-FSU College of Engineering researchers develop AI tool to predict E. coli contamination in waterways appeared first on Florida State University News.

As the global film industry descends on the 79th Cannes Film Festival beginning May 12, it does so at a pivotal moment: Cinema is redefining who, or what, gets to be considered a creator.  

The rise of generative AI has ignited one of the most consequential debates the industry has faced since the transition from film to digital: Is storytelling still a fundamentally human act?  

The festival recently ruled that any film where generative AI serves as the “principal authoring tool” is ineligible for the Palme d’Or, the highest prize awarded to the director of the best feature film at Cannes. This includes AI-driven scripts, visual generation and principal performance synthesis.   

Jason Maurer, Head of Animation at the Florida State University College of Motion Picture Arts, is exploring how AI can be used ethically in creative spaces, with a strong focus on storytelling, filmmaking and animation production pipelines.   

One of his guiding principles for navigating AI and filmmaking is Wharton Associate Professor Ethan Mollick’s four basic rules: Be the human in the loop, invite AI to the table, treat AI like a person and assume this is the worst AI you’ll ever use. Maurer believes that Cannes’ push toward human-centric filmmaking is less a rejection of technology than a defense of authorship.  

“AI is a collaborator, not a creator,” Maurer said. “The ethics around how it’s built are non-negotiable, and the real threat isn’t the tool — it’s the humans wielding it without accountability.”   

Jason Maurer is available to speak with media on these angles that intersect AI and the film industry. He can be reached via email at jmaurer@fsu.edu.   

• Authorship and accountability still belong to humans: AI can speed up production, but it can’t take responsibility for a story. The real debate isn’t about banning AI — it’s about keeping humans accountable for what ends up on screen. 

• Audience trust will hinge on transparency, not technology: Viewers are open to AI-assisted films if the story resonates, but they want honesty about how it was made. The industry’s challenge isn’t AI itself — it’s clearly labeling and owning the creative process. 

• AI is expanding access while raising real ethical risks: The technology is lowering costs and giving indie filmmakers new creative power, but many tools are built on legally and ethically uncertain foundations. The opportunity is huge, but how the industry addresses those risks will define its future. 

Jason Maurer, Head of Animation, FSU College of Motion Picture Arts 

To the average film viewer, much of the AI-generated content might be indistinguishable to actual human content. Are these human-centric stances like what Cannes is doing good for the industry, or are we at a point where we’ve lost the audience’s trust for what is real on the screen? 

Whether it’s good for the industry depends on what we mean by “human centric.” If the standard is that a human directed the work, made the choices and bears the artistic responsibility, then a filmmaker using an ethically sourced AI tool is still making a human-centric film. The human is still in the loop — to borrow Ethan Mollick’s framing, which I apply to my own creative process. We didn’t stop telling stories around the campfire when the printing press arrived. Portrait painting didn’t disappear because of the photograph. Tools change. Authorship doesn’t.  

The animation industry has already lived through this. When CG arrived, the field declared 2D dead — and it nearly was, commercially, in the U.S. for most of the 2000s. Hundreds of traditional animators lost careers in that transition. We should be honest about that. But 2D didn’t die. It evolved, and the medium today is richer for having both languages available. 

Proponents of human-centric cinema endorse its authentic storytelling as one of the standards of film. While generative AI can perhaps maximize efficiencies in film, what makes the human element more important? 

The reframe I’d offer is this: The question isn’t really whether AI can be human-centric. It’s whether humans using AI are operating in good faith.  

Iris Knobloch, the Cannes president, said when announcing the 2026 selection that “AI knows how to imitate very well, but it will never know how to feel.” I’d sharpen that. AI doesn’t need to feel. The humans making the work need to. The humans watching it need to. That’s where the human element actually lives — not in the tool, but in the people on either side of it.  

The deeper case for human-centric storytelling is responsibility. Films are made by people. People can be questioned, credited, sued, hired or fired. Models can’t. As long as humans are answerable for what shows up on screen, we have an industry that can correct itself when something goes wrong. And here’s why that matters for the aesthetic question, not just the legal one: a story someone is staking themselves on is a story that carries weight. Audiences can feel the difference between work someone is answerable for and work that’s been generated to fill a slot. That stake is what authenticity actually is. 

The post Cannes at a crossroads: FSU Head of Animation available for interviews on the future of AI and film appeared first on Florida State University News.

National AI Literacy Day is observed annually to educate individuals on navigating a world immersed in artificial intelligence. Held on March 27 this year, the day promotes ways in which humans, including educators, can embrace the technology and better prepare for its impact.

According to the adaptive learning company HMH, research is showing many educators are growing comfortable using AI, but few feel confident teaching students how to use it responsibly. The company’s Educator Confidence Report from 2025 shows 68% of educator respondents said AI saves them one to five hours per week, allowing more time for student connection and engagement.

Florida State University’s Paul Marty is Professor in the School of Information in the College of Communication and Information and Associate Vice Provost for Academic Innovation. He works to coordinate, communicate and facilitate efforts among campus stakeholders to foster an environment that encourages and supports academic innovation at FSU. Marty serves as one of the university’s top experts in AI.

While AI’s impact on various industries remains to be seen, Marty emphasizes that human skills remain as important as ever.

“There are naturally a lot of worries right now about how artificial intelligence is going to reshape the workforce, universities and modern society,” Marty said. “You’ll hear people ask, ‘Why go to school, why study something new, why bother learning anything at all if AI already knows everything?’ In that environment, I think it’s important for us to remember that, for all its impressive capabilities, all AI can do is remix what humans already know how to do. When push comes to shove, what sets humans apart from AI is our creativity, our passion and our capacity to imagine new things. And that’s why our humanity, our curiosity and our ability to learn is so important.”

Media interested in gaining insight into AI literacy and understanding how universities like FSU are working with the technology may reach out to Paul Marty at marty@fsu.edu.

Paul Marty, associate vice provost for academic innovation, Florida State University

What is the value of human skills like critical thinking in an AI-driven world?

The most important skill our students need in an AI-driven world is their humanity. I tell our students all the time that what matters most – and what employers actually want – is their communication skills, their people skills, their management skills, their leadership skills, their empathy, their humanity, their ability to learn how to learn, and their ability to share what they’ve learned with other human beings in a way that inspires everyone to move forward and make the world a better place. If we don’t keep learning, we don’t move forward. If all we do is teach what we already know, then the world doesn’t move forward. Only by being open to learning new things are we able to innovate, to embrace risk, to grow, to improve; and in a world where artificial intelligence is ubiquitous, it’s our humanity that is going to make the difference.  

What’s the future of undergraduate education in the age of AI?

 If you talk with faculty at any university about undergraduate students and artificial intelligence for any length of time, the topic of cheating will inevitably come up. And when that happens, I usually try to turn that conversation around. Instead of worrying about cheating, I’ll say, try asking your students to tell you about the classes that they are not cheating in, and why they aren’t cheating in those classes. If you do that, what you’ll hear is a description of the university of the future – one where students are engaged in the material they are learning, and where they are not just learning things, but learning how to apply the things they’ve learned in new ways to define problems and develop solutions that will move humanity forward. In my opinion, the purpose of higher education should be to give our students those exact opportunities, both in and out of the classroom. Here at FSU, for example, we offer classes in Design Thinking and sponsor extracurricular events like Design Sprints where we provide our students with unique and incredibly valuable opportunities to work closely with industry, university and community partners, and apply what they are learning in the classroom to design innovative solutions to real-world, challenging problems. The more we can offer our students those kinds of experiences, the more we can let everyone know that our institutions are committed to the future of student success in a changing world, and that we are empowering our faculty, our staff and our students to thrive in that future.

 How are universities adapting to teaching and learning in the age of AI?

When it comes to artificial intelligence and higher education, many institutions are reacting from a place of fear, and that makes perfect sense. Change is hard. Innovation is disruptive, and universities worldwide are facing a future that threatens to overwhelm them with transformational change. The way people react when new technologies are introduced into their social systems is quite naturally from a place of fear. So here at FSU, we’re working with our faculty, staff and students to take us from a culture of fear to a culture of innovation. This is not easy, but it is an opportunity for us to think carefully about the purpose of higher education, and to determine whether our assessments are actually measuring what we think they are measuring, whether the things we are asking our students to do are actually worth doing and whether the things our students are learning are actually the things they should be learning. Those are not easy questions to answer, but by answering those questions, we can present a clear vision, with compelling stories and a positive message about why higher education still matters in our changing world. And by doing that, we can empower our institutions to proactively adopt disruptive innovations, respond effectively to radical change and shape the future of teaching and learning. 

The post FSU expert available for interviews on AI literacy appeared first on Florida State University News.

Florida State University is shaping the future of teaching, learning and living with artificial intelligence (AI) through international initiatives, including a recent program in Thailand where an FSU faculty member explored how AI is transforming entrepreneurship, education and small business development across the Indo-Pacific region. 

Eric Liguori, Jim Moran Professor and associate dean for research and external relations in the Jim Moran College of Entrepreneurship at FSU, served as lead moderator and facilitator for “Entrepreneurship in the Age of AI,” a two-day forum held Dec. 9-10 in Phuket, Thailand, that brought together more than 40 educators, policymakers, entrepreneurs and innovation leaders from the U.S. and countries across Asia-Pacific. 

Participants explored how AI and emerging digital technologies are redefining entrepreneurship education, enabling small and medium-sized enterprises to scale, and opening new pathways for U.S.-Indo-Pacific collaboration. The program also emphasized the role of education systems in preparing learners across disciplines to work effectively and responsibly alongside intelligent technologies. 

As lead moderator and facilitator, Liguori guided discussions on AI readiness, entrepreneurship education, workforce transformation and small business innovation. Sessions combined expert keynotes, policy roundtables and hands-on breakout groups focused on AI governance, talent development and access to capital. 

“Artificial intelligence is changing not just what entrepreneurs do, but how quickly they need to learn, adapt and make decisions,” Liguori said. “This program was designed to help educators and ecosystem leaders think beyond tools and focus on building entrepreneurial mindsets that allow individuals and organizations to navigate uncertainty responsibly and creatively.” 

Susan Fiorito, dean of the Jim Moran College of Entrepreneurship, said the program reflects Florida State’s growing global leadership at the intersection of entrepreneurship and emerging technologies. 

“FSU is uniquely positioned to contribute to these global conversations because of our deep expertise in entrepreneurship education and our commitment to real-world impact,” Fiorito said. “Eric’s leadership in this program highlights how our faculty are shaping international dialogue on innovation, workforce readiness and economic development.” 

The forum concluded with delegates outlining a confidential framework focused on AI education, subject matter expert (SME) innovation and cross-border digital collaboration between the U.S. and Indo-Pacific countries. The initiative aims to enhance geopolitical competitiveness while establishing practical pathways for shared and sustainable growth. 

The program was administered by World Learning, an international education institution delivering programs in more than 150 countries worldwide. It was funded by the U.S. Department of State as part of its broader efforts to strengthen international collaboration, workforce readiness and economic resilience through education and entrepreneurship. 

The initiative aligns with FSU’s broader engagement in global education, public-private partnerships and research-informed approaches to entrepreneurship and innovation. 

At FSU, AI efforts are faculty-led and driven by the university’s commitment to student success. Faculty and staff on multiple campus committees are charged with developing best practices, policies and guidelines to ensure FSU’s faculty, staff and students have access to the latest AI technologies and are equipped with the skills they need to use AI effectively and ethically in the classroom, on campus and beyond.  

For more information about the Jim Moran College of Entrepreneurship at FSU, visit jimmorancollege.fsu.edu. To learn more information on AI initiatives at FSU, visit ai.fsu.edu. For more information about FSU’s global footprint, visit global.fsu.edu. 

The post FSU professor leads AI and entrepreneurship program in Thailand sponsored by US Department of State appeared first on Florida State University News.

Super Bowl LX featuring the Seattle Seahawks and New England Patriots has plenty of on-field storylines. But already making headlines off the field is the amount of commercials using artificial intelligence for production and storytelling.

As the revolutionary technology impacts everyday life, consumers are already seeing the effects of AI leading up to the Super Bowl. Brands have begun to create a hybrid model where AI is a collaborator in the creative and production process – from script development and director’s treatments to visual effects and animation.

While several ads have already been unveiled on social media leading up to the Super Bowl, much of the consumer reaction is based on what will air Sunday on NBC and Peacock before, during and after the game. The public response, which is expected to be varied across demographics, could be an early indicator of how consumers are embracing the AI-dominant creative process in commercials.

Brian Parker is an associate teaching professor for professional communication at Florida State University Panama City. His research is focused on consumer behavior, brand equity and image, advertisement strategy and response. Parker has extensive field experience as a consumer and market researcher, having consulted as an analyst on projects for companies including Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Celebrex, Miller Beer, Budweiser, Nescafé and Florida Power & Light.

Parker believes AI’s heavy influence in advertising represents a new frontier.

“Consumer behavior is inherently interdisciplinary, drawing from psychology, sociology and economics,” Parker said. “From this perspective, AI is poised to change how consumers engage with Super Bowl advertising in both exciting and cautionary ways, with effects that vary across psychological tendencies, cultural context and generational differences.”

For more analysis on consumer behavior and reaction toward Super Bowl commercials, media may reach out to Associate Teaching Professor Brian Parker via email at bparker@fsu.edu.

Brian Parker, associate teaching professor, Florida State University Panama City

This year’s Super Bowl commercials are expected to see an enormous breakthrough in AI development, from production to accelerated ideation. What kind of impact do you expect this to have on consumer behavior toward these ads?

From a psychological standpoint, AI will likely increase attention and novelty in the short term. AI-driven visuals, hyper-personalized storytelling and rapid creative iteration can produce ads that feel surprising, emotionally resonant and highly tailored. However, consumers are also becoming increasingly persuasion-savvy. When an ad feels overly synthetic or manipulative, audiences may disengage or question its authenticity. In this environment, trust becomes just as important as creativity.

Advertising, after all, operates in the interruption business. If brands fail to interrupt with something relevant, entertaining or meaningful, they simply become part of the clutter competing for attention. AI may help brands break through that clutter, but only if it enhances, rather than replaces, human insight.

Culturally, AI signals a broader shift in which technology is no longer operating behind the scenes but becoming part of the narrative itself. For some audiences, AI-enabled ads will represent innovation and progress. For others, particularly amid concerns about job displacement and ethics, they may trigger skepticism or backlash. Brands that acknowledge AI transparently and use it as a tool rather than a gimmick are more likely to resonate.

From a sociological angle, the Super Bowl functions as a shared, communal ritual. AI will likely amplify this collective experience by accelerating meme creation, social sharing and second-screen engagement. Ads may be designed not simply to be watched, but to be remixed, discussed and debated in real time. Given the influence of social media and creators in shaping culture, this may be the most immediate short-term impact of AI-generated advertising.

Are there any AI commercials that have already been released or will be released on Super Bowl Sunday that you feel could reflect the technology’s enormous impact?

Even before kickoff, several AI-driven Super Bowl commercials have already generated significant buzz, signaling just how deeply artificial intelligence is shaping the advertising landscape. Early releases, teasers and online conversations show that AI is not simply influencing what happens during the game, but also how audiences anticipate and talk about ads in the days leading up to it.

One of the clearest examples is Svedka Vodka, which released a spot that relies heavily on generative AI for its visuals, choreography and character animation. In this case, AI is not just a behind-the-scenes production tool but part of the creative identity of the ad itself. By placing machine-assisted creativity front and center, the brand invites viewers to react directly to the aesthetic and emotional feel of AI-generated content. The mixed reactions it has sparked, with some viewers finding it innovative and others finding it artificial or uncanny, highlight the ongoing tension between novelty and authenticity.

At the same time, major technology companies such as OpenAI, Google and Microsoft are using Super Bowl advertising to position AI as an everyday, consumer-friendly tool. Rather than focusing purely on spectacle, these campaigns emphasize normalization by showing AI integrated into daily life, work and creative tasks. This reflects a broader shift from presenting AI as futuristic to presenting it as practical and accessible. From a consumer behavior perspective, these commercials function as more than product promotions. They also serve as cultural signals that shape how people feel about AI itself.

Ultimately, these early examples demonstrate that AI is already influencing both the creative process and the narrative content of advertising. Its impact is not theoretical or future focused. It is happening now and reshaping how brands capture attention, build relationships and connect emotionally with consumers.

The post FSU expert on consumer behavior analyzes the impact of artificial intelligence in Super Bowl commercials appeared first on Florida State University News.

The Florida State University College of Law, along with the Stoops Center for Law and Business and the Institute of Law, Technology, and Innovation, hosted its first AI Day in the Capital last week, bringing together experts to discuss the future of artificial intelligence.

With College of Law Dean and Donald J. Weidner Chair Erin O’Hara O’Connor kicking off the event with a welcome message, the day was filled with discussions and presentations that included leaders in government, law, technology, and academia. The event examined the rapidly evolving landscape of AI and its implications for public institutions, civic infrastructure and ethical governance.

The post From strategy to synergy: FSU hosts first AI Day in the Capital appeared first on Florida State University News.

The global demand for artificial intelligence (AI) has driven billions of dollars into new data centers, sharply increasing energy use and costs for consumers.

Built to handle the massive computational power of AI workloads, these data centers are creating wholesale electricity costs as much as 267% more than five years ago for customers living in those areas. A single ChatGPT query consumes approximately 10 times as much energy as a traditional Google search.

Florida State University’s Mark McNees is a professor at the Jim Moran College of Entrepreneurship who specializes in social entrepreneurship and innovation. He directs the Social and Sustainable Enterprises program, providing expertise on areas that include organization transformation, board governances, multi-stakeholder networks and building cultures of innovation.

McNees suggests that the surge in energy expenses driven by AI could just be getting started.

“As AI adoption accelerates and data centers proliferate to support this demand, we’re facing significant upward pressure on electricity prices that most consumers don’t yet realize is coming,” McNees said.

McNees teaches several social entrepreneurship courses while mentoring FSU students in the cultivation, refinement and launch of social enterprises. He has written several opinion columns and editorials on energy sustainability and efficiency, and hosts the long-running InNOLEvation Mindset Podcast that tells the stories of various entrepreneurs.

Professor Mark McNees is available for interviews on the intersection of AI infrastructure and energy grid capacity. He can be reached at mmcnees@jimmorancollege.fsu.edu.

Mark McNees, director, Social and Sustainable Enterprises

Worldwide surging demand for AI has collided with rising energy costs for customers in areas where data centers are operating. How sustainable is this type of dilemma in the long term?
The short answer: It’s not sustainable without fundamental changes to how we finance energy infrastructure. The current system was designed for an era when electricity demand grew only modestly year over year. That world ended when ChatGPT launched.

Here’s the economic reality nobody wants to discuss: Utilities are building expensive infrastructure based on speculative data center demand. Electric utility company AEP Ohio alone has received requests for 30 gigawatts of new connections from data centers, enough to power 24 million homes. But data center developers are shopping for projects across multiple locations before committing. When those projects don’t materialize, who pays for the stranded infrastructure? Ratepayers. As one consultant from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis put it, residential customers tend to end up holding the bag for stranded costs.

The sustainability question cuts both ways. Yes, wholesale electricity prices have surged 267% in some areas near data center clusters. But the contrarian view supported by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory research suggests that states with higher electricity demand growth have experienced smaller retail price increases. The logic is straightforward, when more electricity flows across existing infrastructure, fixed costs are spread over more kilowatt-hours.

The difference between these outcomes comes down to planning and who bears the costs. In northern Virginia, large data center customers cover roughly 9% of transmission costs, helping keep residential transmission rates below the national average. In Mississippi, data center revenue has funded grid modernization without raising household rates. The model works when implemented thoughtfully. The crisis emerges when it isn’t.

What potential solutions are there to allow consumers to not bear the cost of rising energy prices from these AI data centers?
The good news: Solutions exist, and some tech companies are already implementing them. Microsoft recently announced it will request to pay higher electricity rates in areas where it’s building data centers — specifically to prevent residents from subsidizing its AI infrastructure. The announcement came after President Trump indicated his administration is working with major tech companies to ensure Americans don’t “pick up the tab” for their power consumption.

But voluntary corporate goodwill isn’t a policy framework. Here are the structural solutions that can protect consumers:

Require data centers to build their own generation. Solar and battery storage are now the cheapest and fastest ways to deploy new electricity capacity. When Meta built a data center in Aiken, South Carolina, it partnered with a solar developer to install 100 megawatts of on-site generation. Redwood Materials launched a microgrid combining 12 megawatts of solar with 63 megawatt-hours of storage specifically to power AI data centers. The technology exists. Policy should incentivize — or mandate — its deployment.

Reform interconnection and capacity market rules. Utilities shouldn’t build infrastructure for speculative projects. Stricter requirements — like those AEP Ohio proposed, requiring data centers to post more collateral or commit to specific electricity purchases — can ensure developers have skin in the game before ratepayers assume risk.

Leverage distributed energy resources. A Rewiring America report proposes an elegant inversion: If data center developers invested in residential energy efficiency (heat pumps, rooftop solar, home batteries) they could “unlock the capacity they need” while reducing household bills. In California, a virtual power plant test dispatched 535 megawatts from over 100,000 homes, meeting half of San Francisco’s energy demand. The infrastructure exists in America’s rooftops. We’re just not using it strategically.

Embrace renewable energy as the fastest path to capacity. During a July 2025 Senate hearing, a Vantage Data Centers executive testified that meeting America’s AI power needs requires all energy sources — including storage. His key insight: Renewables paired with batteries provide the “reliable, grid dispatchable” power that data centers need. This isn’t environmental activism. It’s the fastest way to build capacity. Orders for new gas turbines face seven-year delays. Solar installations can be deployed in months.

The post Florida State University expert provides analysis on surging energy costs from artificial intelligence appeared first on Florida State University News.

The Florida State University College of Law, through the Stoops Center for Law and Business and in conjunction with the Institute of Law, Technology, and Innovation, will host AI Day in the Capital at 9 a.m. Thursday, Jan. 22. The event brings together leaders in government, law, technology and academia to examine how artificial intelligence is reshaping public institutions, civic infrastructure and governance.

AI Day in the Capital will focus on how AI is already being deployed across state and local systems — and how law, policy and ethics must evolve alongside it. Through conversations, expert panels and hands-on demonstrations, participants will explore responsible AI adoption, transparency, workforce impacts, access to justice and public trust.

“AI is already reshaping how governments serve the public and how the law responds to innovation,” said Erin O’Hara O’Connor, dean of the FSU College of Law. “AI Day in the Capital creates an important forum for policymakers, scholars and practitioners to engage directly with these issues and to explore how AI can be deployed responsibly and in service of the public good.”

Sponsored by Amazon, the event reflects a university-wide effort to convene expertise across disciplines. Speakers and participants include leaders from national law firms, technology companies, and various colleges and units at FSU, as well as government officials and industry experts from across the country.

AI Day in the Capital will feature hands-on demonstrations highlighting AI in action across the university, from health care and atmospheric research to legal applications.

The event is free and open to the public. Continuing Legal Education credit is available. Members of the media are encouraged to attend; interviews with speakers and university leadership are available upon request.

Visit the AI Day in the Capital website to view the full schedule and register.

The post FSU Law to host inaugural AI Day in the Capital appeared first on Florida State University News.

Florida State University researchers are part of a multi-institutional team awarded a $5 million grant from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to develop new tools using artificial intelligence to help children with speech and language limitations communicate.

Andrea Barton-Hulsey and Michelle Therrien, associate professors in the FSU School of Communication Science and Disorders, will lead two of six projects supported by the five-year Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Augmentative and Alternative Communication grant.

The team’s work focuses on developing AI-enhanced tools to help children with significant speech and language limitations communicate more easily and precisely. Notably, the collaborative effort also includes a constituent board of adults who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), ensuring that the research is guided by the expertise and lived experiences of people with disabilities.

“I am thrilled that the work of Dr. Therrien and Dr. Barton-Hulsey is being supported through this significant funding,” said Dean Michelle Kazmer of FSU’s College of Communication and Information. “Their combined expertise and innovative application of AI will help improve the lives of young people, both those who use augmentative and alternative communication tools as well as those who interact with them. Their impactful solutions in application of health technologies align beautifully with FSU Health and with the needs of children in Florida and across the globe.”

Therrien’s research project focuses on identifying “social zones” on playgrounds, analyzing the language used in those zones and developing technology supports to help children who use AAC communicate more effectively with their peers.

“Friendships are protective factors for physical health, mental health, academic performance, and community engagement,” Therrien said. “Giving children a voice is critical to building relationships and preventing social isolation.”

Barton-Hulsey leads the literacy assessment portion of the grant, which aims to create and evaluate new technology for assessing literacy in children with intellectual or developmental disabilities who use AAC.

“Providing young children with communication tools not only gives them credibility but also prevents judgment about their true abilities, opening doors to academic learning and further development,” Barton-Hulsey said.

Both projects are part of a larger collaborative effort involving researchers from FSU, University of Arkansas, Auburn University, Penn State University and Temple University, as well as the constituent board of adult AAC users. The team’s efforts also include ensuring that participants are fairly compensated for their expertise and time.

“These grants allow us to address gaps in supporting early communication and literacy development for children who use limited or no speech,” Barton-Hulsey said. “Our collaboration with engineers, educators and adults who use AAC is essential to developing effective tools and strategies.”

The projects under the grant add to the growing body of research based at FSU that help generate and share innovative strategies for improving human communication across the entire lifespan.

“This grant is a testament to the expertise and innovative approaches of Dr. Barton-Hulsey and Dr. Therrien to solving real-world challenges,” said SCSD Director Carla Wood. “This award positions our school as a vital hub for cutting-edge AAC research that will directly impact clinical practice, inform how we prepare the next generation of practitioners, and strengthen our collaborative work through FSU Health to serve children and families in our community and beyond. We are incredibly proud that their work helps ensure that every child has access to the communication tools they need.”

For more information about FSU’s College of Communication and Information, visit cci.fsu.edu. To learn more about FSU’s School of Communication Science and Disorders, visit commdisorders.cci.fsu.edu.

FSU Health is a transformational initiative to improve health in Florida by leveraging Florida State University’s cutting-edge research capabilities and academic offerings to forge new collaborations with clinical partners.

The post FSU part of team awarded $5M to develop AI tools for children with speech and language challenges appeared first on Florida State University News.

Florida State University is partnering with Google to offer students complimentary access to the Google People Management Essentials certificate program, which helps students gain leadership and professional skills, while also learning how to use artificial intelligence (AI) at work.

FSU’s College of Business is leading the university initiative in partnership with Information Technology Services to provide this self-paced management training, giving business students a unique opportunity to gain essential leadership skills and hands-on experience with cutting-edge AI tools at no cost.

FSU is one of the first institutions in the country to offer the Google People Management Essentials course.

“We are excited about our partnership with Google, one of the world’s most prominent tech companies, and the benefits it will offer our students,” said Michael D. Hartline, dean of the College of Business. “This collaboration reflects our ongoing commitment to prepare students for the transformative effects of AI on workplaces and society, ensuring they graduate with the relevant, in-demand skills necessary for a rapidly changing world.”

People Management Essentials is an eight-hour, self-paced course developed by the Google School for Leaders, Google’s center for leadership development. Taught by Google experts, the program equips new and aspiring managers with practical skills to build high-performing teams, set and achieve goals, support individual growth and invest in their own development.

A key feature is hands-on experience with AI tools such as Gemini and NotebookLM, empowering participants to incorporate artificial intelligence into their daily management activities — ranging from setting specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound (SMART) goals to developing project plans and customizing communications for a variety of audiences.

“At Google, we’ve seen firsthand how investing in managers creates a more effective, collaborative and supportive environment for all and drives business outcomes,” said Brian Glaser, chief learning officer at Google. “We believe the principles behind effective management are universal. By sharing what we’ve learned, we hope to empower leaders and their teams to thrive in any organization.”

Glaser added, “We believe that great managers create great teams. By making our foundational management principles accessible to everyone, we hope to empower the next generation of leaders to build a better future for teams, one manager at a time.”

For more information, visit business.fsu.edu.

The post FSU College of Business, Google partner to offer free AI-powered management training appeared first on Florida State University News.

Financial scams targeting older adults have reached a high level of sophistication, posing significant risks to this vulnerable demographic.

A recent Scientific American article, co-authored by two experts from Florida State University’s College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, reveals new insights into how artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly deceiving people with financial scams. According to the article, the well-organized attacks are hurting senior citizens because they are more prone to cognitive decline, social isolation or even life transitions.

Thomas Blomberg is the dean and Sheldon L. Messinger Professor of Criminology. He is also the executive director for the FSU Center for Criminology and Public Policy Research. His research focuses on identifying ways to more effectively link research knowledge to public policy. One of his areas of interest is examining the relationship between educational achievement among incarcerated youthful offenders and successful community reintegration.

Blomberg believes there are two main reasons scammers opt to prey on older adults.

“They’re easy targets and often they are fairly affluent,” Blomberg said of what draws scammers to older adults. “I think that’s pretty consistent throughout our research. They’re often not as skeptical. They believe someone’s word is their bond.”

Julie Brancale is an assistant professor at the College of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Her research focuses on understanding the causes, consequences and justice system responses to financial exploitation and victimization of older adults. Brancale also translates her research findings into practical recommendations for policy and practice.

Brancale believes some of the preventative strategies needed for older adults to stay ahead of scammers include building skepticism and getting educated.

“The big thing that we have found is skepticism is important,” Brancale said. “In order to build that skepticism, you need to be educated. What that means is constantly keeping up to date with these scams that are happening and the tactics that people are using. They’re so sophisticated and they’re getting more sophisticated every single day.”

A combination of old and new scam tactics has flooded the elderly in recent years – AI voice-generated phone calls, fraudulent calls demanding immediate payment, lottery and sweepstakes calls and more. For example, the “grandparent scam,” which originated in 2008, exploits a person’s emotions by impersonating a grandchild or another family member in distress.

However, the research by Blomberg and Brancale offers several ways to stay safe from scammers — ranging from social support groups of trustworthy friends, taking practical protections and actively reporting suspicious activity to law enforcement and advocacy groups.

Media interested in learning about the latest research into these sophisticated financial scams can reach out to Dean Blomberg at tblomberg@fsu.edu or Professor Brancale at Julie.Brancale@fsu.edu.

Thomas Blomberg, dean and Sheldon L. Messinger Professor of Criminology

How does the concept of financial wealth factor into older adults getting scammed?

What we found is that for a lot of older people, the idea of money is a little different. When they get to a certain age, it doesn’t have the same significance as when they were younger — struggling and worried about every bill or whether they can afford another car.

What kind of psychological tactics do some of these scammers use to gain the trust of seniors?

I have dealt with many heavy issues but have never found myself quite as emotionally distraught as I was in the Villages, seeing these older people who had been victimized and what it had done to their self-confidence. They’ll make decisions to please the other person. There is a cognition issue where they don’t have as much self-confidence. There’s a lack of skepticism often. And that’s the one thing we try to push in their education is building skepticism through education and awareness and building self-confidence.

Age is a thing in which self-confidence can decline and therefore your decision making can decline.

Julie Brancale, assistant professor

How can family members or caregivers help protect their loved ones from fraud?

With family members, there’s a couple of things that they can do to protect aging loved ones: the first is being in tune with the older adult. A lot of older adults are fearful of letting their family members know that they have been scammed, or they potentially could be scammed, because they’re afraid that their family might come in and take away their independent living situation. Having family members know that older adults truly value that independence and to not try to come in and take away their independence is really important. Having regular conversations and being in touch regularly with their family member to protect, and perhaps notice subtle changes in their cognition and their physical abilities, is also important. For example, ‘Are they talking on the computer more to somebody than they used to?’ I don’t think that there’s a really quick fix. I think this is like a long-term relationship and really building that trust between the parents and children or siblings across generations.

What are the most effective ways to prevent seniors from becoming scam victims?

It’s building education about what’s happening, what kind of scams are out there, what are the tactics that are being used, and then that helps to build that sense of skepticism and confidence in a person’s ability to say no or to delay making a decision. A lot of the scams that we’re seeing nowadays, they’re really putting the pressure on the older adult that you need to act right now. ‘You need to send this money right now. If not, something bad and terrible is going to happen.’ Or on the flip side, ‘if you don’t send this money right now, you’re not going to get the prize that you’re you’ve just won in the lottery.’

What the skepticism and education does is it allows the older adult to take a step back and make decisions a little bit slower. That’s always a good thing. And then identifying a trusted person that the older adult can go to; ‘Who is this that I can contact at any time? And they’re not going to make me feel silly, stupid, afraid for asking the question if this legitimate or is this not.’ Having somebody that that older adult can contact with a potential issue is key. It’s about making sure that an older adult has somebody who really is looking out for their best interest and can provide them additional education and help boost their skepticism and their sense of self-efficacy, or their concept of themselves and their belief in themselves.

A lot of older adults that we’ve interviewed over the years have told us that they fell victim because they didn’t want to reach out. They felt like they were going to be a burden on somebody else. So having somebody there can really be key and help prevent these scams and frauds from happening.

The post FSU experts available for comment on the rise of sophisticated financial scams appeared first on Florida State University News.